<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soda Tax &#8211; Yea or Nay?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nourishfamily.com/2009/09/20/soda-tax-yea-or-nay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nourishfamily.com/2009/09/20/soda-tax-yea-or-nay/</link>
	<description>Nutrition, Fitness, Food, Family, Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:00:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Memo Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://blog.nourishfamily.com/2009/09/20/soda-tax-yea-or-nay/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Memo Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nourishfamily.com/?p=200#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I absolutely think the pros outweigh the cons of taxing sugar sweetened beverages. 

Of course people will drink less soda if it is more expensive, howeverI do feel there should be a mandate on where the funds from these taxes are going. With so many cities out there that are strapped for cash, this may be a tempting source of income when it should all be put back into public health initiatives. 

Afterall, it&#039;s those at or below the poverty line that would be paying the most if this tax levy were passed. It&#039;s only right they should benefit the most from its revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely think the pros outweigh the cons of taxing sugar sweetened beverages. </p>
<p>Of course people will drink less soda if it is more expensive, howeverI do feel there should be a mandate on where the funds from these taxes are going. With so many cities out there that are strapped for cash, this may be a tempting source of income when it should all be put back into public health initiatives. </p>
<p>Afterall, it&#8217;s those at or below the poverty line that would be paying the most if this tax levy were passed. It&#8217;s only right they should benefit the most from its revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
